<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hypochondria on viral marketing</title>
	<link>http://www.newmediasense.net/blogging/hypochondria-on-viral-marketing/</link>
	<description>New Media Strategies’ blog focuses on social marketing news, Web 2.0 developments, and original research on online consumer trends from the industry pioneer of word-of-mouth marketing and online business intelligence.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediasense.net/blogging/hypochondria-on-viral-marketing/#comment-2952</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.newmediasense.net/blogging/hypochondria-on-viral-marketing/#comment-2952</guid>
					<description>so... if Viral and WOM is so effective at driving sales, why does a brand/product with strong positive buzz, um....lets say Apple iPhone, need to spend tens of millions on broadcast advertising to market their new product?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so&#8230; if Viral and WOM is so effective at driving sales, why does a brand/product with strong positive buzz, um&#8230;.lets say Apple iPhone, need to spend tens of millions on broadcast advertising to market their new product?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
